70-497 MA0-100 HP2-B84 TB0-106 HP2-K01 HP2-H09 HP2-Z04 C2180-377 1Z0-272 000-M80 A2030-283 00M-648 MB2-634 000-R15 646-205 000-782 MSC-122 P2050-006 650-026 000-N34 642-845 HP2-Z20 M2180-660 70-622 646-003 070-315 C2010-578 HP2-B46 000-654 ST0-072 250-314 C2180-607 EC1-350 COG-645 000-028 HP2-K16 LOT-848 070-561 000-209 070-226 920-136 922-109 98-366 070-639 920-139 000-733 JN0-531 646-227 ASC-091 HP2-E27 000-218 E20-495 HIO-201 P_HCMTM_64 000-228 BH0-004 HP0-P21 A01-250 GB0-190-English P2090-095 070-668J HP0-S23 070-632 JN0-350 310-027 LOT-927 156-715.70 ST0-058 COG-480 C2090-619 1Z0-212 70-665J 646-229 1Z0-226 646-230 N10-005 70-685 UM0-401 C2140-137 P2080-034 132-S-911 HP3-C29 070-521 HP0-M15 HP2-T24 70-542-Csharp HIT-001 NS0-504 000-702 1Z0-519 050-632 A2090-550 000-M221 HP2-H20 1D0-435 1Z0-040 642-352 A2180-189 000-706 70-561-Csharp
Nate Diaz Slams Judging Criteria Following Close Loss to "Stun Gun" Kim | Fighters.com

Nate Diaz Slams Judging Criteria Following Close Loss to “Stun Gun” Kim

Recommend to your friends!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Neither the UFC’s Nate Diaz nor Strikeforce’s Nick Diaz are strangers to controversy. In fact, the Diaz brothers are two of the most polarizing individuals in the sport, which usually stems from the fact that both men are skilled competitors while also being bad-boys that aren’t afraid to do or say controversial things. In a new interview, Nate Diaz recently blasted the state of judging in MMA and added fuel to a fire that’s already raging. Here are all the details.

In a new interview with Heavy.com, Diaz said the following: “”¦If [your opponent] takes you down and lands in your closed guard and gets punched in the head forty times, is he still ahead on points? If you’re on top, you’re winning, and I think it’s ridiculous”¦ In order to be a good UFC fighter or cage fighter I guess I’ve got to learn how to win the rounds. You’ve got to not fight”¦ Apparently I’ve got to grab him and hold him, otherwise he’ll just grab and hold me”¦ Maybe I don’t need to work on my wrestling. Maybe I just need to do the wrestling and not the fighting.”

I find myself both agreeing with and taking issue with what Diaz says, which honestly doesn’t surprise me given how many different sides there are to the “judging in MMA debate”. So let’s start from the top and work our way down.

First off, I’ve never had a problem with dominant wrestlers fighting to a decision. I enjoy a good KO as much as anybody, but some fighters just aren’t built that way. You can be taught effective striking, you can even get a few (T)KO’s on your record, but the simple fact of the matter is that only a select few MMA fighters have that real, vicious KO power that everyone loves to see. It’s a rare trait, and that’s usually why those who have it and use it to its fullest extent end up being so famous. So my point is this: don’t tell a fighter to finish a fight, because as competitive as MMA is today, that’s a pretty hard thing to do.

But here’s the distinction so few fans are willing to make nowadays: there’s a difference between dominant wrestlers and wrestlers who hold their opponents to score points. That’s the kind of fighting style that Diaz is decrying, and that’s something I honestly agree with. In his fight with Diaz, Dong Hyun Kim seemed downright afraid to strike with him, and proceeded to mostly hold Diaz in position, defend submission attempts, and land barely-damaging shots. Like so many other fighters nowadays, “Stun Gun” showed up to win, he didn’t show up to fight. That’s a terrible mentality for this kind of spectator sport even if it’s a very smart mentality to have as a fighter. Kim played it cautiously in order to win, he didn’t care what the fans thought of his performance, and ultimately, he won the fight but lost the respect of many fans, including me.

Here’s the last I’ll say on this subject: Diaz’s rant was probably motivated by some “sour grapes”, but that shouldn’t discredit what Diaz is saying. Just because both Diaz brothers have always had problems with wrestlers shouldn’t magically invalidate their opinion on the subject. I’ll be the first to admit that both Nick and Nate really need to work on their takedown defense, but I won’t pretend like that immediately disqualifies them from having their say on this fiercely-debated topic. Ultimately, Diaz is preaching to the choir. Sadly, no one seems to be listening.

And what about you, fans and friends? What’s your take on Diaz’s remarks?


Recommend to your friends!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Fighters App

Fighters Mobile Apps

Stay on top of the hottest stories and exclusive interviews from the world of MMA with the Fighters.com mobile apps.

Get Apps Now!